Written Disclaimer
First, about the shortcomings of the article, so that readers who waste time reading it do not curse me and spoil my karma.
- There is “soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo-reading section there is no point on reading this article, you should read the entire article, but you can go to Conclusions and Prospects.
- The article will suggest using your head, especially with the question “Do you really need it?”
- The article will not analyze such an area as the exchange of electronic documents with counterparties, because, as one very smart friend of mine said, “not a single accountant of ours will willingly refuse the fabulous opportunity to correct documents retroactively.” So this analysis will happen when the state pushes everyone on this topic as efficiently and quickly as with VAT.
- And if you, the reader, are a representative/fan of any particular EDI system, don’t read, don’t spoil your mood))).
- The editors' opinion hardly coincides with the author's opinion and vice versa))).
